Original Text(~250 words)
PART III - CHAPTER V Raskolnikov was already entering the room. He came in looking as though he had the utmost difficulty not to burst out laughing again. Behind him Razumihin strode in gawky and awkward, shamefaced and red as a peony, with an utterly crestfallen and ferocious expression. His face and whole figure really were ridiculous at that moment and amply justified Raskolnikov’s laughter. Raskolnikov, not waiting for an introduction, bowed to Porfiry Petrovitch, who stood in the middle of the room looking inquiringly at them. He held out his hand and shook hands, still apparently making desperate efforts to subdue his mirth and utter a few words to introduce himself. But he had no sooner succeeded in assuming a serious air and muttering something when he suddenly glanced again as though accidentally at Razumihin, and could no longer control himself: his stifled laughter broke out the more irresistibly the more he tried to restrain it. The extraordinary ferocity with which Razumihin received this “spontaneous” mirth gave the whole scene the appearance of most genuine fun and naturalness. Razumihin strengthened this impression as though on purpose. “Fool! You fiend,” he roared, waving his arm which at once struck a little round table with an empty tea-glass on it. Everything was sent flying and crashing. “But why break chairs, gentlemen? You know it’s a loss to the Crown,” Porfiry Petrovitch quoted gaily. Raskolnikov was still laughing, with his hand in Porfiry Petrovitch’s, but anxious not to overdo it, awaited the...
Continue reading the full chapter
Purchase the complete book to access all chapters and support classic literature
As an Amazon Associate, we earn a small commission from qualifying purchases at no additional cost to you.
Available in paperback, hardcover, and e-book formats
Summary
Raskolnikov finally confesses his crimes to Sonya, the moment we've been building toward for chapters. He tells her he murdered the old pawnbroker and her sister, watching her face crumble with horror and grief. But here's what matters: Sonya doesn't run. She doesn't judge him. Instead, she sees his suffering and asks what he's done to himself. This scene reveals the core difference between guilt and shame. Raskolnikov has been carrying shame - the belief that he's fundamentally broken. Sonya offers him something different: the possibility that he's a person who did terrible things, not a terrible person. She reads him the story of Lazarus from the Bible, about a dead man brought back to life. It's not subtle symbolism - Dostoevsky is showing us that Raskolnikov is spiritually dead and needs resurrection. Sonya becomes his path back to humanity. What makes this powerful isn't the religious element, but the human one. We all need someone who can see our worst selves and still believe we're worth saving. Sonya represents unconditional love in a world where Raskolnikov has convinced himself he's beyond redemption. The chapter shows how isolation kills us slowly, while connection - even painful, honest connection - offers hope. For readers juggling their own guilt and shame, this chapter demonstrates that confession isn't about punishment, it's about finally being known completely by another person. That's terrifying and necessary.
That's what happens. To understand what the author is really doing—and to discuss this chapter with confidence—keep reading.
Terms to Know
Confession
In Russian Orthodox tradition, confession isn't just admitting wrongdoing - it's a spiritual cleansing that reconnects you to community. Raskolnikov's confession to Sonya represents his first step back toward humanity after months of isolation.
Guilt vs. Shame
Guilt says 'I did something bad' while shame says 'I am bad.' Raskolnikov has been drowning in shame, believing he's fundamentally evil. Sonya's response offers him a path back to guilt - which can be forgiven.
Lazarus Story
A Biblical tale about Jesus raising a dead man back to life. Sonya reads this to show Raskolnikov that spiritual resurrection is possible. It's Dostoevsky's central metaphor for how love can bring someone back from emotional death.
Spiritual Death
The state of being cut off from human connection and empathy. Raskolnikov has been spiritually dead since the murders - alive physically but dead to love, compassion, and community.
Unconditional Love
Love that doesn't depend on someone being good or deserving it. Sonya demonstrates this by staying with Raskolnikov after his confession, seeing his humanity even in his worst moment.
Redemption
The possibility that someone can be saved or made whole again, no matter what they've done. This chapter is about whether Raskolnikov can be redeemed through love and genuine human connection.
Characters in This Chapter
Raskolnikov
protagonist
Finally breaks down and confesses his murders to Sonya, releasing months of isolation and torment. His confession shows he's desperate for human connection but terrified of being rejected completely.
Sonya
moral guide
Responds to Raskolnikov's confession with horror but also compassion, refusing to abandon him. She becomes his lifeline back to humanity by offering unconditional love when he expects only judgment.
Lizaveta
victim
The innocent sister Raskolnikov also killed, whose death weighs heavily on his conscience. Her memory haunts this confession scene as the murder that proved his theory completely wrong.
The Old Pawnbroker
victim
The woman Raskolnikov murdered, whose death he tries to justify as ridding the world of someone useless. Her memory represents his failed attempt to prove he was above moral law.
Why This Matters
Connect literature to life
This chapter teaches how to recognize when self-hatred is actually preventing healing, and how the right witness can transform destructive shame into productive guilt.
You have the foundation. Now let's look closer.
Key Quotes & Analysis
"What have you done to yourself?"
Context: Her immediate response after Raskolnikov confesses to murder
This question cuts to the heart of everything. Sonya doesn't ask what he did to his victims - she sees that he's destroyed himself. It's the response of someone who loves him and recognizes his suffering.
"We will go together... we will bear the cross together!"
Context: After reading the Lazarus story and promising to follow him to Siberia
Sonya commits to sharing his burden rather than letting him carry it alone. This promise of companionship offers him what he's been missing - genuine human connection through the worst circumstances.
"I murdered myself, not the old woman!"
Context: During his breakdown while confessing to Sonya
He finally understands that his crime destroyed him more than anyone else. This recognition that he's the real victim of his own actions is the beginning of his path toward healing.
Intelligence Amplifier™ Analysis
Thematic Threads
Confession
In This Chapter
Raskolnikov finally tells Sonya about the murders, breaking his isolation through truth-telling
Development
Culmination of his internal struggle with secrecy that's been building since chapter one
Redemption
In This Chapter
Sonya's response suggests possibility of spiritual resurrection through human connection
Development
First genuine hope for Raskolnikov's recovery after chapters of despair
Class
In This Chapter
Sonya, despite her poverty and prostitution, becomes Raskolnikov's moral superior and guide
Development
Continues inversion of social hierarchies—the 'lowest' person offers salvation to the 'educated'
Isolation
In This Chapter
Raskolnikov's confession breaks the deadly silence that's been consuming him
Development
Turning point from the crushing loneliness that's driven him toward madness
Identity
In This Chapter
Question of whether Raskolnikov is a murderer or a person who murdered—fundamental difference
Development
Core identity crisis reaches resolution through Sonya's ability to separate person from actions
Modern Adaptation
When Someone Finally Listens
Following Rodion's story...
Rodion finally tells Maya the truth about what happened at the warehouse job. How he wasn't just fired for attendance—he stole from the cash register to pay rent, and when the elderly night security guard caught him, Rodion shoved her. She fell, hit her head, died three days later in the hospital. The family never pressed charges because they thought it was an accident. Rodion expected Maya to call the police, to run, to look at him like the monster he believes he is. Instead, she sits quietly, tears streaming down her face. 'What have you done to yourself?' she whispers. Not 'How could you do this to her?' but 'What has this done to you?' She sees him—really sees him—the sleepless nights, the way he flinches when sirens pass, how he's been slowly dying inside. Maya doesn't minimize what happened or offer cheap comfort. She grieves for the old woman, for her family, and for Rodion—for the person he was before that night destroyed him. For the first time in months, Rodion isn't alone with his secret. The shame that's been eating him alive begins to shift into something else—guilt that might actually lead somewhere.
The Road
The road Raskolnikov walked in 1866, Rodion walks today. The pattern is identical: shame isolates and destroys, while witnessed truth—even terrible truth—offers the first possibility of redemption.
The Map
This chapter provides the navigation tool of distinguishing between shame and guilt. Shame says 'I am bad'—guilt says 'I did bad.' Only guilt can lead to change.
Amplification
Before reading this, Rodion might have believed his secret made him unredeemable, that confession meant certain destruction. Now he can NAME the difference between shame and guilt, PREDICT that isolation will kill him slowly, and NAVIGATE toward someone who can witness his truth without fleeing.
You now have the context. Time to form your own thoughts.
Discussion Questions
- 1
What does Raskolnikov finally tell Sonya, and how does she react differently than he expected?
- 2
Why does Sonya ask 'What have you done to yourself?' instead of 'How could you do this to others?' What's the difference?
- 3
Think about times when someone confessed something difficult to you, or when you needed to confess. What made the difference between shame and healing?
- 4
If you were Sonya, how would you handle someone's worst confession? What would help them move forward without minimizing their actions?
- 5
What does this scene teach us about the difference between being broken and doing broken things? Why does that distinction matter for how we treat ourselves and others?
Critical Thinking Exercise
Practice Being Someone's Sonya
Think of someone in your life who might be carrying shame about something - maybe a mistake at work, a parenting moment they regret, or a choice they can't forgive themselves for. Write down exactly what you would say to help them separate their actions from their worth as a person. Practice the difference between 'You're not that kind of person' (which dismisses) and 'You're a good person who did something harmful' (which holds both truth and hope).
Consider:
- •Focus on what this has done TO them, not what they did to others
- •Avoid rushing to minimize or fix - sometimes people need their pain witnessed first
- •Ask yourself: Am I strong enough to hold their full truth without making it about my comfort?
Coming Up Next...
Chapter 20: The Funeral Dinner
In the next chapter, you'll discover the psychology of public grief, and learn guilt distorts even sympathy. These insights reveal timeless patterns that resonate in our own lives and relationships.