Original Text(~250 words)
VARIOUS EVENTS FROM THE SAME COUNSEL Jacques Amiot, grand almoner of France, one day related to me this story, much to the honour of a prince of ours (and ours he was upon several very good accounts, though originally of foreign extraction),--[The Duc de Guise, surnamed Le Balafre.]--that in the time of our first commotions, at the siege of Rouen,--[In 1562]--this prince, having been advertised by the queen-mother of a conspiracy against his life, and in her letters particular notice being given him of the person who was to execute the business (who was a gentleman of Anjou or of Maine, and who to this effect ordinarily frequented this prince’s house), discovered not a syllable of this intelligence to any one whatever; but going the next day to the St. Catherine’s Mount,--[An eminence outside Rouen overlooking the Seine. D.W.]--from which our battery played against the town (for it was during the time of the siege), and having in company with him the said lord almoner, and another bishop, he saw this gentleman, who had been denoted to him, and presently sent for him; to whom, being come before him, seeing him already pale and trembling with the conscience of his guilt, he thus said, “Monsieur,” such an one, “you guess what I have to say to you; your countenance discovers it; ‘tis in vain to disguise your practice, for I am so well informed of your business, that it will but make worse for you, to go about to conceal...
Continue reading the full chapter
Purchase the complete book to access all chapters and support classic literature
As an Amazon Associate, we earn a small commission from qualifying purchases at no additional cost to you.
Available in paperback, hardcover, and e-book formats
Summary
Montaigne examines two parallel stories of leaders facing assassination attempts. The Duke of Guise discovers a plot against his life but chooses mercy over revenge, forgiving his would-be assassin and sending him away with a lesson about religious charity. Emperor Augustus faces a similar conspiracy from Cinna, but instead of execution, he grants clemency and even promotes his enemy to consul—a decision that secures his safety for life. Yet the Duke of Guise, despite his mercy, is later murdered anyway. This contrast leads Montaigne to reflect on the role of fortune in human affairs. He argues that we overestimate our ability to control outcomes through planning and wisdom. Whether in medicine, art, war, or politics, fortune plays a decisive role that we rarely acknowledge. The chapter explores how excessive caution and suspicion can be more dangerous than bold trust. Leaders who live in constant fear of betrayal often invite the very treachery they seek to avoid. Montaigne advocates for a middle path: choosing the most honorable course of action while accepting that outcomes remain largely beyond our control. He suggests that courage sometimes means making yourself vulnerable, trusting others despite risk, and focusing on what you can control—your own character and choices—rather than trying to manipulate every variable around you.
That's what happens. To understand what the author is really doing—and to discuss this chapter with confidence—keep reading.
Terms to Know
Grand Almoner
A high-ranking church official who served as the king's personal chaplain and advisor on religious matters. They had significant political influence and often acted as intermediaries between church and state.
Modern Usage:
Like a chief of staff who handles both personal and political matters for a powerful leader.
Queen-Mother
Catherine de' Medici, the mother of the French king who wielded enormous political power behind the scenes. She was known for her political maneuvering and use of spies and informants.
Modern Usage:
The power broker who works behind the scenes, like a political operative or influential family matriarch who pulls strings.
Siege of Rouen
A military campaign in 1562 during France's religious civil wars, where Catholic forces attacked the Protestant-held city. These wars tore France apart as neighbors fought neighbors over religious differences.
Modern Usage:
Any prolonged conflict where communities are divided and trust breaks down, like political polarization that splits families.
Conspiracy
A secret plot to assassinate a political leader, common during this period of religious and political upheaval. Trust was scarce and paranoia was often justified.
Modern Usage:
Any secret plan to undermine or harm someone in power, from workplace politics to actual criminal plots.
Clemency
The decision to show mercy instead of punishment, especially when you have the power to destroy someone. It was considered both a virtue and a political strategy.
Modern Usage:
Choosing forgiveness over revenge when someone has wronged you, like not firing an employee who made a mistake.
Fortune
The unpredictable force that Montaigne believes controls most outcomes in life, regardless of our planning or virtue. Not luck, but the fundamental uncertainty of existence.
Modern Usage:
The reality that life is largely unpredictable despite our best efforts to control outcomes through planning and hard work.
Characters in This Chapter
The Duke of Guise
Protagonist leader facing assassination
A powerful French nobleman who discovers a plot against his life but chooses mercy over revenge. He confronts his would-be assassin with kindness, forgives him, and sends him away safely.
Modern Equivalent:
The CEO who finds out an employee is sabotaging them but chooses mentoring over firing
The Gentleman Assassin
Would-be killer
A man from Anjou hired to kill the Duke but who becomes visibly nervous when confronted. His guilt shows on his face before he even speaks.
Modern Equivalent:
The person caught red-handed in betrayal who can't hide their guilt
Jacques Amiot
Narrator and witness
The grand almoner who tells this story to Montaigne, serving as both religious advisor and political observer. He witnesses the Duke's merciful response firsthand.
Modern Equivalent:
The trusted advisor who sees everything and becomes the keeper of important stories
Emperor Augustus
Historical parallel figure
Roman emperor who faced a similar conspiracy from Cinna but chose clemency over execution. His mercy secured loyalty for life, contrasting with the Duke's later murder.
Modern Equivalent:
The leader whose forgiveness strategy actually works long-term
Cinna
Reformed conspirator
The Roman who plotted against Augustus but was forgiven and promoted to consul. His transformation from enemy to loyal ally shows mercy's potential power.
Modern Equivalent:
The former rival who becomes your strongest supporter after you show them unexpected kindness
Why This Matters
Connect literature to life
This chapter teaches how excessive control and suspicion often create the very problems they're meant to prevent.
Practice This Today
This week, notice when your attempt to control a situation through fear or manipulation makes people more likely to resist or betray you.
You have the foundation. Now let's look closer.
Key Quotes & Analysis
"You guess what I have to say to you; your countenance discovers it; 'tis in vain to disguise your practice, for I am so well informed of your business"
Context: The Duke confronts his would-be assassin who is already pale and trembling with guilt
This shows how guilt reveals itself physically before words are even spoken. The Duke's calm directness demonstrates his control and confidence in a life-threatening situation.
In Today's Words:
I can see it written all over your face, so don't bother lying to me about what you're up to
"We attribute the effects we see to the counsel we were last taking"
Context: Montaigne reflects on how we wrongly credit our decisions for outcomes beyond our control
This reveals our tendency to create false narratives about cause and effect. We want to believe our choices determine outcomes more than they actually do.
In Today's Words:
We convince ourselves that whatever just happened was because of our brilliant planning
"Fortune governs all things; she advances and withdraws things from favour upon no other account than her own will"
Context: Montaigne explains why both merciful and harsh leaders can face the same fate
This captures the central theme that life's outcomes are largely beyond our control. Good people suffer and bad people prosper without clear moral logic.
In Today's Words:
Life is basically random - good things and bad things happen regardless of whether you deserve them
Intelligence Amplifier™ Analysis
The Road of Honorable Risk
The more desperately we try to control outcomes through suspicion and manipulation, the more likely we are to create the very problems we're trying to prevent.
Thematic Threads
Fortune vs. Control
In This Chapter
Two leaders make opposite choices about mercy, with unpredictable results—showing how little our decisions actually control outcomes
Development
Introduced here
In Your Life:
You might see this when your careful planning fails while someone else's spontaneous decision succeeds perfectly.
Trust and Vulnerability
In This Chapter
Augustus chooses to trust his would-be assassin completely, making himself vulnerable but gaining lasting loyalty
Development
Introduced here
In Your Life:
You face this every time you decide whether to give someone a second chance after they've let you down.
Character Under Pressure
In This Chapter
Both leaders reveal their true nature when facing mortal threat—one chooses mercy, the other chooses strategic clemency
Development
Introduced here
In Your Life:
You discover who you really are in moments when you have power over someone who has wronged you.
The Limits of Wisdom
In This Chapter
Montaigne argues that we overestimate how much our intelligence and planning actually influence outcomes
Development
Introduced here
In Your Life:
You might notice this when your most careful decisions backfire while your gut instincts prove right.
Modern Adaptation
When the Promotion Goes Sideways
Following Arthur's story...
Arthur discovers that two colleagues have been undermining him to the department chair, hoping to block his tenure application. He has evidence of their sabotage—copied emails, documented lies about his teaching evaluations. His first instinct is to expose them publicly, maybe leak the emails to other faculty, destroy their reputations before they destroy his. But something stops him. Instead, he approaches them directly, shows them what he knows, and offers a way forward: 'Let's focus on making the department better rather than tearing each other down.' One colleague is genuinely remorseful and becomes an ally. The other continues plotting, but now other faculty see the contrast between Arthur's grace and his colleague's pettiness. Arthur's vulnerability—refusing to play dirty despite having ammunition—shifts the entire dynamic. Yet he knows there's no guarantee. Sometimes mercy works, sometimes it doesn't. Fortune still decides the final outcome.
The Road
The road the Duke of Guise walked in 1580, Arthur walks today. The pattern is identical: when facing betrayal, the impulse to control through fear and retaliation often creates more enemies than it stops.
The Map
This chapter provides a navigation tool for handling workplace betrayal and office politics. Arthur can choose honor over manipulation, knowing that vulnerability sometimes protects better than armor.
Amplification
Before reading this, Arthur might have escalated the conflict, creating a toxic environment where everyone watches their backs. Now he can NAME the pattern of defensive aggression, PREDICT how paranoia breeds more betrayal, and NAVIGATE by choosing courage over control.
You now have the context. Time to form your own thoughts.
Discussion Questions
- 1
Both the Duke of Guise and Emperor Augustus discovered assassination plots against them. How did each leader respond, and what were the eventual outcomes?
analysis • surface - 2
Why does Montaigne suggest that excessive caution and suspicion might actually create more danger than trust and mercy?
analysis • medium - 3
Think about workplaces, relationships, or parenting situations you've observed. Where have you seen someone's attempts to control outcomes through suspicion actually backfire?
application • medium - 4
When facing a situation where someone might betray or disappoint you, how do you decide between protecting yourself and choosing to trust? What factors guide that choice?
application • deep - 5
Montaigne argues we should focus on our character and choices rather than trying to control outcomes. What does this mean for how we handle uncertainty and risk in our daily lives?
reflection • deep
Critical Thinking Exercise
Map Your Control vs. Trust Decisions
Think of a current situation where you're deciding between protecting yourself through control or choosing to trust despite risk. Draw two columns: 'What I Can Control' and 'What I Cannot Control.' Fill in each side, then identify what the most honorable choice would be, regardless of outcome. Consider how your attempts to control the uncontrollable might be creating the problems you're trying to avoid.
Consider:
- •Notice if your protective measures are creating resentment or distance
- •Consider whether your character and values align with your current approach
- •Examine if fear of betrayal is preventing you from building genuine connection
Journaling Prompt
Write about a time when someone showed you unexpected mercy or trust when they could have chosen suspicion or punishment. How did their choice affect your behavior toward them?
Coming Up Next...
Chapter 24: True Learning vs. Empty Knowledge
Moving forward, we'll examine to distinguish between genuine wisdom and mere academic posturing, and understand memorizing facts without understanding leads to intellectual emptiness. These insights bridge the gap between classic literature and modern experience.