Original Text(~250 words)
OF LIARS There is not a man living whom it would so little become to speak from memory as myself, for I have scarcely any at all, and do not think that the world has another so marvellously treacherous as mine. My other faculties are all sufficiently ordinary and mean; but in this I think myself very rare and singular, and deserving to be thought famous. Besides the natural inconvenience I suffer by it (for, certes, the necessary use of memory considered, Plato had reason when he called it a great and powerful goddess), in my country, when they would say a man has no sense, they say, such an one has no memory; and when I complain of the defect of mine, they do not believe me, and reprove me, as though I accused myself for a fool: not discerning the difference betwixt memory and understanding, which is to make matters still worse for me. But they do me wrong; for experience, rather, daily shows us, on the contrary, that a strong memory is commonly coupled with infirm judgment. They do, me, moreover (who am so perfect in nothing as in friendship), a great wrong in this, that they make the same words which accuse my infirmity, represent me for an ungrateful person; they bring my affections into question upon the account of my memory, and from a natural imperfection, make out a defect of conscience. “He has forgot,” says one, “this request, or that promise; he no more...
Continue reading the full chapter
Purchase the complete book to access all chapters and support classic literature
As an Amazon Associate, we earn a small commission from qualifying purchases at no additional cost to you.
Available in paperback, hardcover, and e-book formats
Summary
Montaigne opens with a startling confession: he has terrible memory, so bad that people think he's lying when he complains about it. But instead of seeing this as purely negative, he explores how his forgetfulness has shaped him in surprisingly positive ways. His poor memory keeps him from being overly talkative (since he can't remember enough stories to bore people), protects him from holding grudges (he literally forgets who wronged him), and prevents him from pursuing political ambition (where remembering details is crucial). This leads him to his main point about lying. Montaigne argues that successful lying requires excellent memory because liars must keep track of multiple versions of events and remember which story they told to whom. When liars alter the same story repeatedly, they inevitably contradict themselves because the original truth, lodged firmly in memory, competes with their fabricated versions. He shares diplomatic stories where ambassadors were caught in lies precisely because they couldn't maintain consistency. Montaigne sees lying as humanity's worst vice because our word is the only bond we have with each other. Unlike truth, which has one face, falsehood has infinite forms, making it both tempting and ultimately unsustainable. His poor memory, ironically, makes him more honest because he can't effectively lie even if he wanted to. The chapter reveals how our apparent weaknesses might actually protect us from worse character flaws, and how understanding the mechanics of deception can help us navigate a world full of people whose memories work all too well.
That's what happens. To understand what the author is really doing—and to discuss this chapter with confidence—keep reading.
Terms to Know
Memory as social currency
In Montaigne's time, having a good memory was considered essential for social status and credibility. People who forgot things were seen as stupid or unreliable. Your ability to remember details, stories, and obligations determined how others viewed your intelligence and character.
Modern Usage:
We still judge people harshly for forgetting names, appointments, or promises, often seeing it as disrespect rather than a genuine limitation.
Renaissance diplomacy
The complex world of 16th-century international relations where ambassadors and negotiators had to remember multiple versions of agreements and conversations. Success depended on verbal precision and memory since written records were limited.
Modern Usage:
Like modern politicians or lawyers who must keep their stories straight across multiple interviews and depositions.
Conscience versus memory
Montaigne distinguishes between moral character (conscience) and mental capacity (memory). He argues that people wrongly assume someone with poor memory lacks moral integrity, when these are completely separate qualities.
Modern Usage:
We still confuse someone's organizational skills or memory with their trustworthiness, like assuming a forgetful person doesn't care.
The mechanics of lying
Montaigne's theory that successful deception requires excellent memory because liars must track multiple false stories and remember which version they told to whom. Poor memory makes lying nearly impossible to sustain.
Modern Usage:
Modern psychology confirms this - pathological liars often have exceptional memories, while honest people sometimes seem inconsistent because they're not rehearsing false narratives.
Truth versus falsehood structure
Montaigne's insight that truth has 'one face' - there's only one version of what actually happened - while lies have infinite possible variations, making them harder to maintain consistently over time.
Modern Usage:
This principle underlies modern interrogation techniques and fact-checking - truth remains consistent while false stories change with each telling.
Natural imperfection as protection
The idea that our weaknesses can actually shield us from worse character flaws. Montaigne suggests his poor memory prevents him from lying effectively, gossiping extensively, or holding grudges.
Modern Usage:
Like how social anxiety might protect someone from getting involved in toxic friend groups, or how being bad with money prevents someone from gambling addictions.
Characters in This Chapter
Montaigne
Self-examining narrator
Presents himself as someone with terrible memory who has learned to see this weakness as potentially protective. He analyzes how his forgetfulness affects his relationships and moral choices, ultimately arguing it makes him more honest.
Modern Equivalent:
The self-aware friend who knows their flaws but has figured out how to work with them
The ambassadors
Cautionary examples
Diplomatic figures Montaigne describes who got caught in lies because they couldn't remember which version of events they had told to different people. They represent how even skilled negotiators fail when they try to maintain false narratives.
Modern Equivalent:
Politicians or executives who get caught contradicting themselves in different interviews
Plato
Ancient authority
Referenced as the philosopher who called memory 'a great and powerful goddess,' establishing the high value placed on memory in intellectual tradition. Montaigne uses this to show he understands what he's missing.
Modern Equivalent:
The respected expert whose opinion everyone quotes to prove their point
Why This Matters
Connect literature to life
This chapter teaches how people with excellent memories often use that skill to craft multiple versions of the same story for different audiences.
Practice This Today
This week, notice when someone tells you a story that doesn't quite match what they told someone else - the inconsistencies reveal where they're managing impressions rather than sharing truth.
You have the foundation. Now let's look closer.
Key Quotes & Analysis
"There is not a man living whom it would so little become to speak from memory as myself, for I have scarcely any at all"
Context: Opening confession about his terrible memory
This startling admission immediately establishes Montaigne's honesty and vulnerability. Rather than hiding his weakness, he leads with it, setting up his exploration of how this flaw has shaped his character and worldview.
In Today's Words:
I have the worst memory of anyone you'll ever meet, and I'm telling you upfront.
"They bring my affections into question upon the account of my memory, and from a natural imperfection, make out a defect of conscience"
Context: Explaining how people mistake his poor memory for lack of caring
This reveals the social cost of his memory problems and introduces his key distinction between mental capacity and moral character. People assume he doesn't care about them because he forgets things, when the two are unrelated.
In Today's Words:
People think I don't care about them just because I can't remember stuff, like my brain problems are actually heart problems.
"Lying is an accursed vice. It is only our word that binds us together and makes us human"
Context: His passionate argument against dishonesty
This shows Montaigne's core belief that honesty is fundamental to human society. Our ability to trust each other's words is what allows civilization to function, making lying a betrayal of our basic humanity.
In Today's Words:
Lying is the worst thing you can do because our promises to each other are all that hold society together.
"Truth has but one face, but falsehood has a hundred thousand"
Context: Explaining why lies are harder to maintain than truth
This captures his insight into the structural difference between truth and lies. There's only one version of what actually happened, but infinite ways to lie about it, which is why liars eventually contradict themselves.
In Today's Words:
The truth is just one story, but you can lie in a million different ways - that's why liars always mess up eventually.
Intelligence Amplifier™ Analysis
The Road of Honest Weakness - How Our Flaws Can Protect Us
Our apparent weaknesses often shield us from worse character defects by making certain vices impossible or impractical to pursue.
Thematic Threads
Identity
In This Chapter
Montaigne reframes his bad memory from shameful weakness to protective strength
Development
Continues his theme of accepting rather than hiding personal quirks
In Your Life:
You might discover your 'flaws' actually protect you from behaviors you'd regret
Deception
In This Chapter
Lying requires excellent memory to track multiple versions of truth
Development
Introduced here - explores the mechanics of dishonesty
In Your Life:
You can spot liars by watching for contradictions in their stories over time
Social Expectations
In This Chapter
Society values good memory, but Montaigne shows its dark potential
Development
Builds on earlier themes about questioning conventional virtues
In Your Life:
You might resist 'improving' traits that actually serve you well as they are
Human Relationships
In This Chapter
Our word is the only bond between people - lying destroys trust
Development
Introduced here - the foundation of all human connection
In Your Life:
You realize why broken promises damage relationships more than other failures
Personal Growth
In This Chapter
Growth isn't always about fixing flaws - sometimes it's understanding their purpose
Development
Evolves from self-acceptance to strategic self-knowledge
In Your Life:
You might stop trying to fix every perceived weakness and start leveraging some of them
Modern Adaptation
When the Promotion Goes Sideways
Following Arthur's story...
Arthur's department head position opened up, and everyone assumed he'd apply. But Arthur knows his weakness: he's terrible at remembering administrative details, student names, and bureaucratic procedures. While his colleagues see this as disqualifying, Arthur realizes it's actually protected him. He can't play favorites because he forgets who complained about what. He can't hold departmental grudges because he literally doesn't remember old conflicts. Most importantly, he can't effectively lie in faculty meetings because he can't keep his stories straight. When the ambitious Dr. Martinez gets caught contradicting herself about budget allocations - claiming different numbers to different committees - Arthur sees the pattern. Her excellent memory, which everyone admired, became her downfall when she tried to manipulate multiple audiences. Arthur's forgetfulness keeps him honest by default. He decides not to pursue the promotion, recognizing that his 'weakness' actually makes him a better teacher and colleague than those with superior administrative skills.
The Road
The road Montaigne walked in 1580, Arthur walks today. The pattern is identical: apparent weaknesses often shield us from worse character flaws, while our 'superior' abilities can become tools for self-destruction.
The Map
This chapter provides a framework for reframing personal limitations. Instead of seeing every weakness as something to fix, Arthur can ask what vices his flaws protect him from.
Amplification
Before reading this, Arthur might have felt ashamed of his poor memory and pushed himself toward administrative roles. Now he can NAME his protective limitation, PREDICT how 'fixing' it might corrupt him, and NAVIGATE his career by choosing roles that align with his authentic strengths.
You now have the context. Time to form your own thoughts.
Discussion Questions
- 1
Montaigne claims his terrible memory actually protects him from becoming a bore, holding grudges, and lying effectively. How does having a 'weakness' shield him from these worse behaviors?
analysis • surface - 2
Why does Montaigne argue that successful lying requires excellent memory? What happens when liars try to keep track of multiple versions of the same story?
analysis • medium - 3
Think about people you know who seem 'too nice' or 'too shy' for certain situations. What negative behaviors might these apparent weaknesses be protecting them from?
application • medium - 4
When have you tried to 'fix' something about yourself, only to discover you lost something valuable in the process? How do you decide which personal traits to change versus accept?
application • deep - 5
Montaigne sees lying as humanity's worst vice because 'our word is the only bond we have with each other.' In a world where people constantly bend the truth, how do you maintain trust and authenticity?
reflection • deep
Critical Thinking Exercise
Map Your Protective Weaknesses
List three things about yourself that you consider weaknesses or limitations. For each one, spend 2-3 minutes identifying what negative behavior or vice this 'weakness' might actually be protecting you from. Consider how your inability to do certain things well might be keeping you out of trouble or preserving your integrity.
Consider:
- •Your social awkwardness might protect you from manipulative networking
- •Your inability to 'play the game' might preserve your authenticity
- •Your emotional sensitivity might prevent you from becoming callous or cruel
Journaling Prompt
Write about a time when you felt pressure to overcome a perceived weakness. What would you have gained, but more importantly, what might you have lost? How has this 'flaw' actually served you over time?
Coming Up Next...
Chapter 10: Quick or Slow Speech
In the next chapter, you'll discover to match your communication style to different situations, and learn preparation and spontaneity each have their place. These insights reveal timeless patterns that resonate in our own lives and relationships.