Original Text(~250 words)
Chapter II. He Gets Rid Of His Eldest Son You can easily imagine what a father such a man could be and how he would bring up his children. His behavior as a father was exactly what might be expected. He completely abandoned the child of his marriage with Adelaïda Ivanovna, not from malice, nor because of his matrimonial grievances, but simply because he forgot him. While he was wearying every one with his tears and complaints, and turning his house into a sink of debauchery, a faithful servant of the family, Grigory, took the three‐year‐old Mitya into his care. If he hadn’t looked after him there would have been no one even to change the baby’s little shirt. It happened moreover that the child’s relations on his mother’s side forgot him too at first. His grandfather was no longer living, his widow, Mitya’s grandmother, had moved to Moscow, and was seriously ill, while his daughters were married, so that Mitya remained for almost a whole year in old Grigory’s charge and lived with him in the servant’s cottage. But if his father had remembered him (he could not, indeed, have been altogether unaware of his existence) he would have sent him back to the cottage, as the child would only have been in the way of his debaucheries. But a cousin of Mitya’s mother, Pyotr Alexandrovitch Miüsov, happened to return from Paris. He lived for many years afterwards abroad, but was at that time quite a young man, and...
Continue reading the full chapter
Purchase the complete book to access all chapters and support classic literature
As an Amazon Associate, we earn a small commission from qualifying purchases at no additional cost to you.
Available in paperback, hardcover, and e-book formats
Summary
Fyodor Karamazov proves to be exactly the kind of father you'd expect from a selfish, dramatic man—he completely abandons his three-year-old son Mitya. The child would have been left in rags if not for Grigory, the family servant, who steps in as the only caring adult. Even Mitya's mother's family forgets about him initially. Eventually, Pyotr Miüsov, a worldly cousin of Mitya's deceased mother, returns from Paris and intervenes. When he approaches Fyodor about taking responsibility for Mitya's education, Fyodor actually pretends not to understand which child he's talking about—a performance typical of his theatrical nature. Miüsov becomes Mitya's guardian and takes him away, but then he too gets distracted by political events in Paris and shuffles the boy between various relatives. Mitya grows up believing he has an inheritance waiting for him, which shapes his entire approach to life. When he finally comes of age and confronts his father about money, Fyodor has been systematically cheating him through small payments and manipulative agreements. By the time Mitya realizes what's happened, his father has essentially stolen his entire inheritance while making it look legal. This financial betrayal becomes the foundation for a much larger family catastrophe that's about to unfold. The chapter reveals how childhood abandonment and financial manipulation can poison relationships for decades, setting up the explosive conflicts to come.
That's what happens. To understand what the author is really doing—and to discuss this chapter with confidence—keep reading.
Terms to Know
Debauchery
Excessive indulgence in sensual pleasures - drinking, partying, sexual excess. In 19th century Russia, this was considered especially scandalous for a father and landowner who should be setting an example.
Modern Usage:
We see this in celebrities or politicians whose partying lifestyle makes headlines while their responsibilities suffer.
Guardian
A legal arrangement where someone other than the parents takes responsibility for raising a child. In Dostoevsky's time, this often happened when wealthy relatives stepped in for neglectful parents.
Modern Usage:
Today this includes foster care, legal guardianship, or when grandparents raise their grandchildren due to parents' addiction or absence.
Inheritance manipulation
The practice of legally cheating someone out of money they're supposed to inherit through small payments, false agreements, or taking advantage of their trust. Common among unscrupulous family members.
Modern Usage:
This happens when parents drain college funds, elderly relatives are financially exploited, or family businesses are secretly sold off.
Parental abandonment
When a parent completely neglects their child's basic needs - not from inability, but from selfishness or indifference. The parent is present but emotionally and practically absent.
Modern Usage:
We see this in parents who prioritize dating, addiction, or career over their children's basic emotional and physical needs.
Surrogate parenting
When someone other than the biological parents steps in to provide the care and guidance a child needs. Often servants, relatives, or family friends who see a child being neglected.
Modern Usage:
This includes teachers, coaches, neighbors, or extended family who become the stable adult presence in a neglected child's life.
Financial gaslighting
Making someone believe they're wrong about money matters through manipulation, false records, or confusing explanations. Used to justify taking what belongs to someone else.
Modern Usage:
This happens in abusive relationships where one partner controls all finances and makes the other doubt their understanding of their own money.
Characters in This Chapter
Fyodor Karamazov
Neglectful father/antagonist
Completely abandons his three-year-old son Mitya, not out of malice but pure selfishness and forgetfulness. Later systematically cheats Mitya out of his inheritance through manipulative agreements.
Modern Equivalent:
The deadbeat dad who's too busy partying to remember he has kids
Mitya (Dmitri)
Abandoned child/protagonist
The three-year-old victim of his father's neglect who grows up believing he has money coming to him. This false expectation shapes his entire adult life and relationship with his father.
Modern Equivalent:
The kid who grows up thinking the family has money but finds out it's all been spent
Grigory
Surrogate father figure
The family servant who steps in to care for abandoned Mitya when no one else will. Represents the working-class person with more moral integrity than the wealthy family he serves.
Modern Equivalent:
The nanny or babysitter who becomes more of a parent than the actual parents
Pyotr Alexandrovitch Miüsov
Well-meaning but distracted guardian
Mitya's wealthy cousin who intervenes to save the child from neglect but then gets caught up in his own interests and passes the boy around to various relatives.
Modern Equivalent:
The relative who steps in during a crisis but then gets busy with their own life
Why This Matters
Connect literature to life
This chapter teaches how people use complex explanations and small incremental betrayals to steal while maintaining plausible deniability.
Practice This Today
Next time someone gives elaborate explanations for why they can't pay you back or why 'temporary' help became permanent, document the pattern instead of accepting the story.
You have the foundation. Now let's look closer.
Key Quotes & Analysis
"He completely abandoned the child of his marriage with Adelaïda Ivanovna, not from malice, nor because of his matrimonial grievances, but simply because he forgot him."
Context: Explaining how Fyodor treats his three-year-old son after his wife's death
This reveals that Fyodor's neglect isn't even motivated by anger or revenge - it's pure indifference. The casual nature of 'simply because he forgot him' shows how completely self-absorbed he is.
In Today's Words:
He didn't abandon his kid out of spite - he literally just forgot he had one because he was too wrapped up in himself.
"If he hadn't looked after him there would have been no one even to change the baby's little shirt."
Context: Describing how Grigory the servant became Mitya's caretaker
The specific detail about changing shirts emphasizes how basic the neglect was - this child would have been left in dirty clothes. It shows how a servant had to step in for the most fundamental parental duties.
In Today's Words:
Without the hired help, this baby would have been sitting in dirty diapers with no one caring.
"But if his father had remembered him he would have sent him back to the cottage, as the child would only have been in the way of his debaucheries."
Context: Explaining that Fyodor's forgetfulness was actually better for Mitya than his attention would have been
This shows that even if Fyodor had remembered his son, it would only have been to get rid of him more efficiently. The child's welfare never enters the equation - only whether he interferes with partying.
In Today's Words:
Even if dad had remembered he had a kid, he would have just shipped him off so he wouldn't cramp his party lifestyle.
Intelligence Amplifier™ Analysis
The Road of Justified Abandonment
The practice of abandoning responsibilities while constructing noble-sounding explanations that protect the abandoner's self-image.
Thematic Threads
Abandonment
In This Chapter
Fyodor completely abandons his three-year-old son, leaving him in rags until a servant intervenes
Development
Builds on earlier theme of emotional distance, now showing how it escalates to complete neglect
In Your Life:
You might recognize this in parents who disappear after divorce or friends who vanish during your tough times
Performance
In This Chapter
Fyodor theatrically pretends not to know which child Miüsov is discussing when confronted about responsibility
Development
Extends the earlier theatrical behavior into active deception and responsibility avoidance
In Your Life:
You see this when people act confused about commitments they clearly remember making
Class
In This Chapter
Miüsov, the worldly cousin from Paris, swoops in as savior but then gets distracted by political events and abandons Mitya too
Development
Shows how class privilege can create the illusion of rescue while perpetuating the same neglect
In Your Life:
This appears when well-meaning but privileged people offer help they can't sustain
Financial Manipulation
In This Chapter
Fyodor systematically steals Mitya's inheritance through small payments and manipulative legal agreements
Development
Introduced here as a new dimension of betrayal that will drive future conflicts
In Your Life:
You might see this in family businesses where one person controls finances while others do the work
Expectations
In This Chapter
Mitya grows up believing he has an inheritance waiting, which shapes his entire approach to life and relationships
Development
Shows how false promises in childhood create unrealistic adult expectations
In Your Life:
This happens when parents make promises about support or inheritance they never intend to keep
Modern Adaptation
When Dad's 'Help' Costs Everything
Following Ivan's story...
Marcus grew up believing his father would help him buy a house when he got steady work. His dad, a small-time contractor, always promised 'we'll figure something out when you're ready.' When Marcus landed his warehouse job and started saving, his father suddenly got vague. 'Which house fund?' he'd ask with theatrical confusion. 'I never promised anything specific.' Meanwhile, Marcus discovered his father had been 'borrowing' from the college fund Marcus's grandmother left him, taking small amounts over the years for 'emergencies' and 'investments.' Each withdrawal came with elaborate explanations about 'growing the money' and 'teaching Marcus about patience.' By the time Marcus realized what happened, his inheritance was gone, replaced by a stack of IOUs and his father's wounded act about being 'unappreciated' for his financial guidance. The betrayal wasn't just the money—it was watching his father perform innocence while systematically stealing his future. Now Marcus faces his thirties with no safety net and a father who still insists he was 'helping' all along.
The Road
The road Mitya walked in 1880, Marcus walks today. The pattern is identical: parental abandonment disguised as wisdom, financial betrayal wrapped in noble language, and the victim gaslit into questioning their own memory of promises made.
The Map
This chapter provides a navigation tool for recognizing justified abandonment—when people craft virtuous explanations for failing their responsibilities. Marcus can use this to document gaps between words and actions instead of arguing with elaborate justifications.
Amplification
Before reading this, Marcus might have kept hoping his father would eventually 'make things right' or believing he misunderstood the promises. Now he can NAME justified abandonment, PREDICT how it escalates into deeper betrayals, and NAVIGATE it by protecting his remaining resources rather than trusting future promises.
You now have the context. Time to form your own thoughts.
Discussion Questions
- 1
How does Fyodor react when confronted about his son's care and education, and what does this reveal about his character?
analysis • surface - 2
Why do you think both Fyodor and Miüsov use elaborate justifications for essentially abandoning Mitya rather than simply admitting they don't want the responsibility?
analysis • medium - 3
Where have you seen people today use noble-sounding language to justify abandoning their responsibilities to family, work, or community?
application • medium - 4
If you were in Mitya's position as an adult discovering years of financial manipulation disguised as care, how would you protect yourself while confronting the situation?
application • deep - 5
What does this chapter suggest about how people protect their self-image when their actions contradict their values, and why is this pattern dangerous in relationships?
reflection • deep
Critical Thinking Exercise
Decode the Justification Game
Think of a time when someone abandoned a responsibility to you but made it sound like they were doing you a favor. Write down their exact words, then translate what actually happened. For example: 'I'm giving you space to figure this out yourself' might translate to 'I don't want to deal with your problem.' Practice recognizing the gap between virtuous language and actual behavior.
Consider:
- •Notice if their explanation made you feel guilty for needing help
- •Look for patterns where their 'gifts' consistently benefit them more than you
- •Consider how this affects your ability to trust their future promises
Journaling Prompt
Write about a responsibility you've been tempted to abandon. What noble-sounding justification did you consider using, and what would honest accountability look like instead?
Coming Up Next...
Chapter 3: The Second Marriage's Dark Pattern
What lies ahead teaches us predators exploit vulnerable people in desperate situations, and shows us children suffer when adults prioritize their own needs over responsibility. These patterns appear in literature and life alike.