Original Text(~250 words)
OF THE BATTLE OF DREUX [December 19, 1562, in which the Catholics, under the command of the Duc de Guise and the Constable de Montmorenci, defeated the Protestants, commanded by the Prince de Conde. See Sismondi, Hist. des Francais, vol. xviii., p. 354.] Our battle of Dreux is remarkable for several extraordinary incidents; but such as have no great kindness for M. de Guise, nor much favour his reputation, are willing to have him thought to blame, and that his making a halt and delaying time with the forces he commanded, whilst the Constable, who was general of the army, was racked through and through with the enemy’s artillery, his battalion routed, and himself taken prisoner, is not to be excused; and that he had much better have run the hazard of charging the enemy in flank, than staying for the advantage of falling in upon the rear, to suffer so great and so important a loss. But, besides what the event demonstrated, he who will consider it without passion or prejudice will easily be induced to confess that the aim and design, not of a captain only, but of every private soldier, ought to regard the victory in general, and that no particular occurrences, how nearly soever they may concern his own interest, should divert him from that pursuit. Philopoemen, in an encounter with Machanidas, having sent before a good strong party of his archers and slingers to begin the skirmish, and these being routed and hotly pursued by...
Continue reading the full chapter
Purchase the complete book to access all chapters and support classic literature
As an Amazon Associate, we earn a small commission from qualifying purchases at no additional cost to you.
Available in paperback, hardcover, and e-book formats
Summary
Montaigne examines a controversial military decision from the Battle of Dreux, where the Duc de Guise chose to wait while his fellow commander was being overwhelmed by enemy forces. Critics called it cowardice, but Montaigne argues it was strategic wisdom. Through historical examples, he shows how the best leaders sometimes make unpopular choices that serve the greater good. He tells of Philopoemen, who watched his own men get slaughtered rather than break formation, then struck when the enemy was vulnerable and won decisively. He contrasts this with Agesilaus, who chose personal glory over strategy, charged the enemy head-on for honor's sake, and nearly lost everything. Montaigne's point cuts deep: real leadership often means swallowing your pride and doing what works, not what feels heroic. The commander who saves his reputation by rushing to help might lose the entire war. This isn't just about military tactics—it's about life decisions. Sometimes the right choice looks wrong to everyone watching. Sometimes protecting what matters most means letting smaller things fall apart. Montaigne shows us that wisdom often wears the mask of cowardice, while courage can disguise itself as foolishness. The hardest part isn't knowing what to do, but having the strength to do it when everyone else thinks you're wrong.
That's what happens. To understand what the author is really doing—and to discuss this chapter with confidence—keep reading.
Terms to Know
Strategic patience
The military principle of waiting for the right moment to strike, even when it means watching allies suffer in the short term. It requires putting long-term victory over immediate emotional responses.
Modern Usage:
We see this when a manager doesn't immediately defend their team to save the whole department, or when parents let their kids face consequences to teach bigger lessons.
Flank attack
A military maneuver where you attack the enemy from the side rather than head-on. It's riskier but can be more effective than a direct assault.
Modern Usage:
In workplace conflicts, this is like addressing a problem indirectly through HR rather than confronting someone directly.
Battle of Dreux
A 1562 battle during France's religious wars between Catholics and Protestants. Montaigne uses it to examine how controversial decisions can actually be wise strategy.
Modern Usage:
Any situation where someone gets criticized for a decision that later proves to be right, like a CEO making unpopular cuts that save the company.
Military discipline
The ability to stick to the plan even when emotions or immediate circumstances pressure you to break formation. It means trusting the strategy over your feelings.
Modern Usage:
This shows up when you stick to your budget during a sale, or follow your diet plan at a party, even when it feels wrong in the moment.
Reputation vs. results
The tension between doing what looks good to others and doing what actually works. Montaigne argues that effective leaders often have to choose results over appearance.
Modern Usage:
This happens when a teacher doesn't give extra credit to be popular, or when a parent enforces rules even when their kid calls them 'mean.'
Command responsibility
The idea that a leader's primary duty is to the overall mission, not to any individual person or their own reputation. Sometimes this means making brutal choices.
Modern Usage:
A nurse supervisor who assigns the hardest cases to their best nurses, even though it seems unfair, because patient care comes first.
Characters in This Chapter
Duc de Guise
Controversial military commander
He chose to wait and let his fellow commander get overwhelmed rather than rush to help, which critics called cowardice but Montaigne argues was strategic wisdom that won the battle.
Modern Equivalent:
The boss who doesn't immediately jump in to save a struggling employee because they're focused on the bigger picture
Constable de Montmorenci
Fellow commander who suffered
He was the general who got overwhelmed by enemy artillery while Guise waited. His capture and the destruction of his forces looked terrible but served the larger strategy.
Modern Equivalent:
The team member who gets thrown under the bus for the greater good of the project
Philopoemen
Ancient military strategist
Montaigne's example of a commander who watched his own archers get slaughtered rather than break formation, then struck when the enemy was vulnerable and won decisively.
Modern Equivalent:
The coach who doesn't call timeout during a rough patch because they see the bigger game strategy
Machanidas
Enemy commander
He fell into Philopoemen's trap by pursuing the retreating archers too aggressively, leaving his main force exposed and vulnerable to counterattack.
Modern Equivalent:
The competitor who gets so focused on one small victory that they lose sight of the bigger competition
Agesilaus
Contrasting example
Unlike the strategic commanders, he chose personal honor over tactics, charging directly at enemies for glory rather than using smart strategy.
Modern Equivalent:
The person who always has to have the last word in an argument, even when staying quiet would win them more
Why This Matters
Connect literature to life
This chapter teaches how to recognize when immediate action serves ego rather than effectiveness.
Practice This Today
This week, notice when you feel pressure to 'do something' immediately—pause and ask whether you're solving the problem or managing your reputation.
You have the foundation. Now let's look closer.
Key Quotes & Analysis
"The aim and design, not of a captain only, but of every private soldier, ought to regard the victory in general, and that no particular occurrences, how nearly soever they may concern his own interest, should divert him from that pursuit."
Context: Montaigne defending why commanders must focus on overall victory rather than immediate concerns
This captures Montaigne's core argument that true leadership requires putting the bigger goal above personal feelings or immediate pressures. It's about having the discipline to see the forest, not just the trees.
In Today's Words:
Everyone needs to keep their eye on the real prize, not get distracted by whatever crisis is happening right now, even if it affects them personally.
"He who will consider it without passion or prejudice will easily be induced to confess that the aim and design ought to regard the victory in general."
Context: Montaigne asking readers to look past their emotional reactions to see the strategic wisdom
Montaigne is calling out how our emotions cloud our judgment about what's actually smart. He's asking us to step back from our gut reactions and think strategically.
In Today's Words:
If you can get past your feelings about it, you'll see that focusing on the big picture was actually the right call.
"No particular occurrences, how nearly soever they may concern his own interest, should divert him from that pursuit."
Context: Explaining why leaders must resist the urge to abandon strategy for immediate concerns
This is about the hardest part of leadership - staying focused on what matters most even when people you care about are suffering. It's brutal but necessary wisdom.
In Today's Words:
Don't let whatever's happening right now, even if it hits close to home, make you lose sight of what you're really trying to accomplish.
Intelligence Amplifier™ Analysis
The Road of Strategic Sacrifice
Choosing long-term effectiveness over short-term reputation, even when it makes you look bad to observers.
Thematic Threads
Leadership
In This Chapter
True leadership often requires making unpopular decisions that serve the greater good rather than immediate appearances
Development
Introduced here
In Your Life:
You might face this when you have to make an unpopular decision at work that protects your team in the long run.
Social Expectations
In This Chapter
Society expects immediate, visible action even when patience and strategy would be more effective
Development
Builds on earlier themes about conformity versus wisdom
In Your Life:
You feel pressure to respond immediately to family drama when stepping back might actually help more.
Pride
In This Chapter
Personal reputation and honor can conflict with practical effectiveness and wise decision-making
Development
Deepens from previous discussions of ego and self-image
In Your Life:
You might choose to argue a point to save face rather than admit you were wrong and move forward.
Wisdom
In This Chapter
True wisdom sometimes appears as cowardice or indifference to those who don't understand the bigger picture
Development
Continues Montaigne's exploration of how wisdom differs from conventional thinking
In Your Life:
Your careful, measured responses to conflict might be seen as weakness by people who prefer dramatic confrontation.
Modern Adaptation
When the Promotion Goes Sideways
Following Arthur's story...
Arthur watches his colleague Dr. Martinez get torn apart in a faculty meeting over a controversial curriculum change. The department chair and senior professors are demanding someone defend Martinez's position on teaching critical thinking in introductory philosophy courses. Arthur knows Martinez is right, but also knows that jumping in now would make him the next target—and he's up for tenure review next year. He stays silent, calculating. If he loses his job defending Martinez today, he can't protect the students who need these ideas tomorrow. Arthur chooses strategic patience over heroic gesture. Later, when the dust settles and emotions cool, he'll build a coalition of younger faculty and present a unified front. But right now, watching Martinez struggle alone, Arthur feels like a coward even though he knows he's playing the long game.
The Road
The road the Duc de Guise walked at Dreux in 1562, Arthur walks today in academic politics. The pattern is identical: choosing long-term effectiveness over short-term heroics, even when it makes you look like you've abandoned your allies.
The Map
This chapter teaches Arthur to distinguish between ego emergencies and real emergencies. When everyone expects immediate action, that's often when patience serves the cause better than gesture.
Amplification
Before reading this, Arthur might have jumped in to defend Martinez and destroyed his own influence. Now he can NAME the pattern of strategic restraint, PREDICT that hasty heroics often backfire, and NAVIGATE toward sustainable change.
You now have the context. Time to form your own thoughts.
Discussion Questions
- 1
Why did critics call the Duc de Guise a coward when he chose not to immediately help his fellow commander at the Battle of Dreux?
analysis • surface - 2
How does Montaigne use the examples of Philopoemen and Agesilaus to show the difference between strategic thinking and acting for appearances?
analysis • medium - 3
Think of a time when someone you know was criticized for not jumping in to help immediately. Looking back, do you think they made the right choice? Why?
application • medium - 4
When have you faced pressure to 'do something' even when you suspected waiting or holding back might be wiser? How did you handle it?
application • deep - 5
What does this chapter reveal about why we often choose actions that make us look good over actions that actually work?
reflection • deep
Critical Thinking Exercise
Map Your Next Strategic Wait
Think of a current situation where you feel pressure to act immediately or jump in to help. Write down what immediate action people expect from you, then list what might happen if you wait and gather more information or let things play out. Consider both the short-term judgment you might face and the long-term outcomes of each approach.
Consider:
- •What are you really protecting - your reputation or the best outcome?
- •Who benefits most from immediate action versus strategic patience?
- •What information might become available if you wait that could change your approach?
Journaling Prompt
Write about a time when you acted too quickly to avoid looking bad, or when you held back despite criticism and it turned out to be the right choice. What did that experience teach you about the difference between courage and wisdom?
Coming Up Next...
Chapter 46: The Power and Peril of Names
As the story unfolds, you'll explore names shape perception and opportunity in ways we rarely consider, while uncovering family legacy and reputation are more fragile than they appear. These lessons connect the classic to contemporary challenges we all face.