Original Text(~250 words)
CHAPTER XV Moscow’s last day had come. It was a clear bright autumn day, a Sunday. The church bells everywhere were ringing for service, just as usual on Sundays. Nobody seemed yet to realize what awaited the city. Only two things indicated the social condition of Moscow—the rabble, that is the poor people, and the price of commodities. An enormous crowd of factory hands, house serfs, and peasants, with whom some officials, seminarists, and gentry were mingled, had gone early that morning to the Three Hills. Having waited there for Rostopchín who did not turn up, they became convinced that Moscow would be surrendered, and then dispersed all about the town to the public houses and cookshops. Prices too that day indicated the state of affairs. The price of weapons, of gold, of carts and horses, kept rising, but the value of paper money and city articles kept falling, so that by midday there were instances of carters removing valuable goods, such as cloth, and receiving in payment a half of what they carted, while peasant horses were fetching five hundred rubles each, and furniture, mirrors, and bronzes were being given away for nothing. In the Rostóvs’ staid old-fashioned house the dissolution of former conditions of life was but little noticeable. As to the serfs the only indication was that three out of their huge retinue disappeared during the night, but nothing was stolen; and as to the value of their possessions, the thirty peasant carts that had come in...
Continue reading the full chapter
Purchase the complete book to access all chapters and support classic literature
As an Amazon Associate, we earn a small commission from qualifying purchases at no additional cost to you.
Available in paperback, hardcover, and e-book formats
Summary
On Moscow's final day before French occupation, the city teeters between normalcy and chaos. Church bells still ring, but the streets tell a different story—crowds searching for answers, prices spiraling wildly as gold and weapons become precious while paper money becomes worthless. At the Rostov house, Count Rostov faces a moral dilemma when wounded officers beg for space in the family's evacuation carts. His generous heart immediately says yes, ordering servants to unload family possessions to make room for the desperate men. But this kindness creates a household crisis. The Countess erupts when she discovers their valuable belongings being removed for strangers, accusing her husband of throwing away their children's inheritance while other wealthy families protect their own interests. The count, always timid about money matters, finds himself caught between his natural compassion and his wife's practical fury. Their daughter Natasha witnesses this family tension, seeing her parents' different approaches to crisis—her father's instinctive generosity versus her mother's protective pragmatism. This moment illuminates how extreme circumstances force impossible choices between self-preservation and moral duty. The chapter captures the universal struggle of wanting to help others while protecting our own, showing how crisis strips away social conventions to reveal our deepest values and fears.
That's what happens. To understand what the author is really doing—and to discuss this chapter with confidence—keep reading.
Terms to Know
Social dissolution
When normal social order breaks down during crisis, revealing who people really are underneath their usual roles. In this chapter, Moscow's polite society crumbles as invasion approaches, showing people's true priorities.
Modern Usage:
We see this during natural disasters when some people hoard supplies while others share everything they have.
Economic panic
When people lose faith in money and normal trade, leading to wild price swings. Gold and weapons become precious while paper money becomes worthless because no one believes it will hold value.
Modern Usage:
This happens during market crashes when people rush to buy gold or bitcoin while dumping stocks.
Moral dilemma
A situation where you must choose between two important values that conflict with each other. Count Rostov must choose between helping wounded soldiers and protecting his family's financial future.
Modern Usage:
Like choosing between caring for aging parents or advancing your career when you can't afford both.
Class privilege
The advantages wealthy people have during crisis, including the ability to evacuate with their possessions while poor people are left behind. The Rostovs debate what to save while others have nothing to lose.
Modern Usage:
During hurricanes, wealthy families can evacuate early while working families stay because they can't afford to miss work.
Collective responsibility
The idea that we have duties to help others in our community, not just our own family. This chapter explores whether the wealthy should sacrifice for strangers in crisis.
Modern Usage:
The debate over whether successful people should pay higher taxes to help fund social programs.
Generational wealth
Money and property passed down through families that provides security across generations. The Countess fights to preserve this inheritance for her children's future.
Modern Usage:
Parents sacrificing to buy homes or pay for college so their kids have better opportunities.
Characters in This Chapter
Count Rostov
Moral protagonist
He immediately offers the family's evacuation carts to wounded officers, showing his generous nature. His kindness creates conflict with practical family needs, revealing the cost of doing right.
Modern Equivalent:
The dad who always helps neighbors even when money's tight
Countess Rostova
Practical antagonist
She erupts in fury when family possessions are unloaded for strangers, arguing they must protect their children's inheritance. Her anger represents the voice of family-first survival.
Modern Equivalent:
The mom who says 'charity begins at home' during tough times
Natasha Rostova
Moral witness
She observes her parents' conflict between generosity and self-preservation, learning how crisis forces impossible choices between helping others and protecting family.
Modern Equivalent:
The teenager watching parents argue about money and values
The wounded officers
Catalysts for moral choice
Their desperate need for transportation forces the Rostov family to choose between compassion and self-interest, creating the central conflict of the chapter.
Modern Equivalent:
The homeless family asking to stay in your spare room
Why This Matters
Connect literature to life
This chapter teaches how to identify people's deepest values by watching their automatic responses when pressure hits.
Practice This Today
This week, notice when someone faces a small crisis—do they help first or protect first, include others or circle the wagons?
You have the foundation. Now let's look closer.
Key Quotes & Analysis
"What does it matter what we take away? Look at them! We can't leave them! It's impossible!"
Context: When he sees wounded officers begging for space in their evacuation carts
This shows the Count's immediate moral response - he can't ignore human suffering even if it costs his family. His repetition of 'impossible' reveals how deeply he feels the moral obligation to help.
In Today's Words:
How can we worry about our stuff when people are literally dying? We have to help them!
"We have been packing all night and have not slept, and now you want to throw away all our work and leave our children as beggars!"
Context: Her angry response to her husband giving away cart space to wounded soldiers
She voices every parent's fear about sacrificing their children's security for strangers. Her exhaustion and panic make her sound selfish, but she's protecting her family's future.
In Today's Words:
I've been working all night to save our family, and now you want to give it all away to people we don't even know!
"Mama, it's not right! Please, let them have the carts!"
Context: Supporting her father's decision to help the wounded officers
Young Natasha instinctively chooses compassion over possessions, showing her moral clarity. Her simple 'it's not right' cuts through adult complexity to basic human decency.
In Today's Words:
Mom, this is wrong! We have to help these people!
Intelligence Amplifier™ Analysis
The Road of Crisis Values - When Emergency Reveals Who We Really Are
Emergency situations strip away social pretenses and force people to act from their deepest values and automatic responses.
Thematic Threads
Class
In This Chapter
The Rostovs' wealth creates the luxury of moral choice—they can afford generosity while others cannot
Development
Evolved from earlier displays of aristocratic privilege to show how class affects moral decision-making
In Your Life:
Your economic position determines which moral choices feel possible versus impossible
Identity
In This Chapter
Count and Countess reveal their core identities through crisis responses—giver versus protector
Development
Builds on character establishment to show identity under extreme pressure
In Your Life:
Crisis moments reveal who you really are beneath your social mask
Social Expectations
In This Chapter
The Countess references what 'other families' do, using social norms to justify self-protection
Development
Continues theme of social pressure influencing personal choices
In Your Life:
You might justify difficult decisions by pointing to what others in your situation typically do
Personal Growth
In This Chapter
Natasha observes her parents' moral conflict, learning about competing values in real time
Development
Continues Natasha's education through witnessing adult complexity
In Your Life:
Watching others navigate moral dilemmas teaches you about your own potential choices
Human Relationships
In This Chapter
Marriage tensions emerge when spouses have different crisis values and priorities
Development
Shows how external pressure tests intimate relationships
In Your Life:
Stress reveals whether you and your partner share the same fundamental values
Modern Adaptation
When Crisis Reveals Character
Following Andrew's story...
Andrew manages a small nonprofit when Hurricane Maria devastates Puerto Rico. His board allocates $50,000 for local disaster relief, but Andrew immediately redirects it to Puerto Rico without approval—his gut says help where it's needed most. The board erupts. The chairwoman argues they have obligations to their own community first, that other organizations will handle Puerto Rico, that Andrew's impulsiveness threatens their local programs. Andrew's assistant Sarah watches the heated meeting, seeing two completely different approaches to crisis: Andrew's instinctive 'help whoever needs it most' versus the board's 'protect our mission first.' Both sides have valid points. The local food bank really does need funding. But Andrew can't unsee the images of families without clean water. Neither approach is wrong, but they're incompatible. The crisis forces everyone to choose between competing moral obligations, revealing what they truly value when forced to pick sides.
The Road
The road Count Rostov walked in 1812, Andrew walks today. The pattern is identical: crisis strips away social niceties and forces us to act from our deepest values—help first or protect first.
The Map
This chapter provides a values-detection system. When pressure hits, people default to their core programming—you can predict behavior by watching their automatic responses to smaller crises.
Amplification
Before reading this, Andrew might have judged the board as selfish or seen himself as simply 'doing the right thing.' Now he can NAME different crisis values, PREDICT who will help versus protect, and NAVIGATE by understanding both responses serve important functions.
You now have the context. Time to form your own thoughts.
Discussion Questions
- 1
What specific actions did Count Rostov and the Countess take when they discovered wounded soldiers needed help, and why did their responses create conflict?
analysis • surface - 2
Why do you think the Count immediately said yes to helping the soldiers while the Countess immediately fought to protect their belongings? What does this reveal about their different approaches to crisis?
analysis • medium - 3
Think about recent emergencies in your community or workplace. Can you identify people who defaulted to helping others versus those who focused on protecting their own interests first?
application • medium - 4
If you were in Natasha's position, watching your parents clash over this decision, how would you handle being caught between their competing values?
application • deep - 5
What does this family crisis teach us about how people reveal their true priorities when normal life breaks down, and why is this knowledge useful for navigating relationships?
reflection • deep
Critical Thinking Exercise
Map Your Crisis Values
Think about a recent stressful situation in your life - a family emergency, workplace crisis, or community problem. Write down your immediate reaction and actions. Then identify whether your default response was to help/include others or protect/secure your own interests first. Neither is wrong - both serve important purposes.
Consider:
- •Your crisis response reveals your deepest programming, not a character flaw
- •Recognizing your pattern helps you prepare for future emergencies
- •Understanding others' crisis patterns helps you predict and work with their responses
Journaling Prompt
Write about a time when you had to choose between helping someone else and protecting your own interests. What did you choose and why? How did that choice reflect your core values?
Coming Up Next...
Chapter 245: The Furniture and the Wounded
In the next chapter, you'll discover privilege can blind us to what truly matters in a crisis, and learn moral courage often comes from the youngest voices. These insights reveal timeless patterns that resonate in our own lives and relationships.