Original Text(~250 words)
CHAPTER XIV Soon after this the children came in to say good night. They kissed everyone, the tutors and governesses made their bows, and they went out. Only young Nicholas and his tutor remained. Dessalles whispered to the boy to come downstairs. “No, Monsieur Dessalles, I will ask my aunt to let me stay,” replied Nicholas Bolkónski also in a whisper. “Ma tante, please let me stay,” said he, going up to his aunt. His face expressed entreaty, agitation, and ecstasy. Countess Mary glanced at him and turned to Pierre. “When you are here he can’t tear himself away,” she said. “I will bring him to you directly, Monsieur Dessalles. Good night!” said Pierre, giving his hand to the Swiss tutor, and he turned to young Nicholas with a smile. “You and I haven’t seen anything of one another yet.... How like he is growing, Mary!” he added, addressing Countess Mary. “Like my father?” asked the boy, flushing crimson and looking up at Pierre with bright, ecstatic eyes. Pierre nodded, and went on with what he had been saying when the children had interrupted. Countess Mary sat down doing woolwork; Natásha did not take her eyes off her husband. Nicholas and Denísov rose, asked for their pipes, smoked, went to fetch more tea from Sónya—who sat weary but resolute at the samovar—and questioned Pierre. The curly-headed, delicate boy sat with shining eyes unnoticed in a corner, starting every now and then and muttering something to himself, and evidently experiencing a...
Continue reading the full chapter
Purchase the complete book to access all chapters and support classic literature
As an Amazon Associate, we earn a small commission from qualifying purchases at no additional cost to you.
Available in paperback, hardcover, and e-book formats
Summary
After the children are supposedly dismissed for the night, young Nicholas Bolkonski secretly remains to listen as the adults discuss politics and reform. Pierre passionately argues that decent men must organize to counter the government's harmful policies, proposing a society modeled after the German Tugendbund. His idealism clashes sharply with Nicholas Rostov's rigid sense of duty - Nicholas declares he would lead troops against even his best friend if ordered by the government. Denisov, characteristically blunt, suggests they should just revolt outright rather than form fancy societies. Throughout this heated debate, young Nicholas sits forgotten in the corner, absorbing every word with intense fascination, unconsciously breaking quills and sealing wax as Pierre's words burn into his consciousness. When the boy finally asks Pierre if his dead father would have agreed with these ideas, Pierre realizes the profound impact adult conversations have on listening children. The chapter reveals how political discussions often expose deeper questions about conscience versus obedience, individual responsibility versus institutional loyalty. More importantly, it shows how the next generation quietly absorbs these moral conflicts, suggesting that young Nicholas will carry these questions about duty, reform, and resistance into his own future.
That's what happens. To understand what the author is really doing—and to discuss this chapter with confidence—keep reading.
Terms to Know
Tugendbund
A German moral and patriotic society that promoted virtue and national renewal through education and character building. Pierre wants to create a similar organization in Russia to counter government corruption through organized citizen action.
Modern Usage:
Like grassroots political movements or community organizing groups that try to create change from the bottom up.
Secret society
An organization that operates in secrecy to pursue political or social goals, often because their activities would be considered subversive by authorities. Pierre proposes forming one to promote reform in Russia.
Modern Usage:
Similar to underground resistance movements, activist networks, or even workplace organizing that happens quietly to avoid retaliation.
Duty vs. conscience
The moral conflict between following orders or social expectations versus doing what you personally believe is right. Nicholas represents blind duty while Pierre argues for following conscience even when it conflicts with authority.
Modern Usage:
The same dilemma facing whistleblowers, employees asked to do unethical things, or anyone torn between loyalty and doing what's right.
Political awakening
The moment when someone, especially a young person, becomes aware of political issues and realizes they have a stake in how society is run. Young Nicholas experiences this as he listens to the adults debate.
Modern Usage:
Like teenagers becoming politically aware through social media, or adults having their first 'wake up' moment about systemic issues.
Generational influence
How adult conversations and conflicts shape the next generation's worldview. Young Nicholas absorbs the political debates around him, which will influence his future choices and beliefs.
Modern Usage:
How kids pick up their parents' political views, or how family dinner conversations about current events shape children's perspectives.
Reform vs. revolution
The debate between gradual change through existing systems versus complete overthrow of the current order. Pierre wants organized reform while Denisov suggests outright revolt.
Modern Usage:
The ongoing tension between working within the system versus radical change, seen in every political movement from voting rights to climate activism.
Characters in This Chapter
Pierre
Idealistic reformer
Passionately argues for creating a secret society to counter government corruption and promote moral reform. His idealism and belief in organized citizen action drives the political debate in this chapter.
Modern Equivalent:
The community organizer who believes change comes through grassroots movements and citizen engagement
Nicholas Rostov
Dutiful soldier
Represents absolute loyalty to authority and government, declaring he would follow orders even against his conscience. His rigid sense of duty clashes directly with Pierre's call for moral resistance.
Modern Equivalent:
The by-the-book employee who follows company policy no matter what, or the 'just following orders' mindset
Young Nicholas Bolkonski
Impressionable observer
Sits forgotten in the corner, absorbing every word of the political debate with intense fascination. His presence reminds us how adult conflicts shape the next generation's moral development.
Modern Equivalent:
The kid who pretends to be asleep but listens to everything, or the teenager quietly forming their worldview from family arguments
Denisov
Blunt pragmatist
Cuts through Pierre's idealistic talk about secret societies by suggesting they should just revolt outright. His directness highlights the gap between theory and action.
Modern Equivalent:
The friend who says 'stop talking and just do something' when everyone else is debating strategy
Countess Mary
Concerned guardian
Quietly observes the heated political discussion while doing needlework, representing the domestic sphere that's affected by but often excluded from political debates.
Modern Equivalent:
The parent trying to maintain normal family life while political tensions swirl around the dinner table
Why This Matters
Connect literature to life
This chapter teaches how to detect when others are silently absorbing information and emotions we think we're keeping private.
Practice This Today
This week, notice when children or quiet adults are present during heated conversations - they're often taking in more than you realize.
You have the foundation. Now let's look closer.
Key Quotes & Analysis
"I would not take part in anything secret that has something bad about it, but I would take part in anything that is good and useful."
Context: When explaining his vision for a reform society to counter government corruption
Shows Pierre's naive idealism - he believes good intentions automatically make actions morally justified. This reveals both his genuine desire for reform and his lack of understanding about how power really works.
In Today's Words:
I'd join any group fighting for good causes, but nothing shady or harmful.
"I swear to you on my honor that if the government ordered me to march against you with a squadron and cut you down, I should not hesitate an instant, but should do it."
Context: Responding to Pierre's talk about organizing against government policies
Reveals the terrifying logic of absolute obedience to authority. Nicholas would literally kill his friend if ordered to do so, showing how institutional loyalty can override personal relationships and moral judgment.
In Today's Words:
If my boss told me to destroy you, I'd do it without thinking twice - that's just how loyalty works.
"Would Papa have agreed with you?"
Context: Asking Pierre about his father's likely position on the political debates
This innocent question cuts to the heart of how we inherit and question our parents' values. It also shows how children seek to understand their place in ongoing moral conflicts through family legacy.
In Today's Words:
Would Dad have been on your side about this?
"We must counteract it, and for that we ought to form a society of friends of the people, such as the German Tugendbund."
Context: Proposing organized resistance to government policies he sees as harmful
Shows Pierre's belief in the power of organized citizen action and moral education to create change. His reference to German models reveals how reform movements cross national boundaries and inspire each other.
In Today's Words:
We need to organize and fight back - form some kind of grassroots movement like they did in Germany.
Intelligence Amplifier™ Analysis
The Road of Silent Absorption - How Children Inherit Our Unfinished Battles
Children unconsciously inherit the unresolved moral conflicts and tensions they witness in adult conversations and debates.
Thematic Threads
Duty versus Conscience
In This Chapter
Nicholas Rostov's absolute loyalty to government clashes with Pierre's moral obligation to resist harmful policies
Development
This tension has built throughout the novel as characters face choices between institutional loyalty and personal ethics
In Your Life:
You face this every time you must choose between following workplace rules and doing what you believe is right for patients or colleagues.
Generational Transmission
In This Chapter
Young Nicholas absorbs the adults' political debates and moral conflicts, unconsciously inheriting their unresolved tensions
Development
Introduced here as a new perspective on how adult conflicts shape the next generation
In Your Life:
Your children are absorbing your struggles with work stress, family conflicts, and moral dilemmas even when you think they're not listening.
Idealism versus Pragmatism
In This Chapter
Pierre's passionate reform plans contrast with Nicholas's practical military obedience and Denisov's blunt revolutionary approach
Development
This theme has evolved from Pierre's earlier spiritual seeking to concrete political action
In Your Life:
You navigate this tension when deciding whether to push for ideal patient care standards or accept realistic limitations within the system.
Hidden Influence
In This Chapter
The adults remain unaware of young Nicholas's presence and the profound impact their words have on him
Development
Reflects the novel's ongoing exploration of how seemingly private moments shape others in unexpected ways
In Your Life:
Your casual conversations about work, relationships, or life challenges influence family members and colleagues more than you realize.
Identity Formation
In This Chapter
Young Nicholas begins forming his worldview through exposure to competing philosophies about duty, resistance, and moral responsibility
Development
Continues the novel's examination of how identity develops through exposure to different value systems
In Your Life:
You're constantly forming your professional and personal identity through conversations and conflicts you witness or participate in.
Modern Adaptation
When Kids Are Always Listening
Following Andrew's story...
Andrew's at his sister's house for Sunday dinner when the adults start arguing politics in the living room. His brother-in-law Jake, a veteran, insists you support whatever the government does, period. Andrew's cousin Maria thinks they should organize, maybe join that new community action group. His uncle just says screw it all, time to stop playing nice. Andrew gets heated talking about how regular people need to stand up to corrupt systems. Nobody notices his eight-year-old nephew Tommy sitting in the corner, supposedly playing on his tablet, but really listening to every word. When Tommy suddenly asks if his dead dad would have agreed with Uncle Andrew about fighting the system, Andrew realizes the kid's been absorbing everything. The passionate adult debate about duty versus resistance, loyalty versus conscience, has been programming this child's understanding of how the world works and what choices matter.
The Road
The road young Nicholas Bolkonski walked in 1812, Tommy walks today. The pattern is identical: children silently inherit the moral conflicts adults cannot resolve.
The Map
This chapter provides a tool for recognizing invisible absorption - understanding that passionate adult conversations become foundational programming for the next generation. Andrew can use this awareness to model moral reasoning, not just moral conflict.
Amplification
Before reading this, Andrew might have assumed kids weren't really listening to grown-up talk. Now he can NAME the pattern of silent inheritance, PREDICT how unresolved conflicts become childhood programming, and NAVIGATE by intentionally modeling how to work through moral dilemmas rather than just expressing them.
You now have the context. Time to form your own thoughts.
Discussion Questions
- 1
What does young Nicholas witness during the adult conversation, and how does he react physically while listening?
analysis • surface - 2
Why do the adults have such different views about duty to government versus personal conscience, and what drives each man's position?
analysis • medium - 3
Where do you see children today absorbing adult conflicts they're not supposed to hear - at work, family gatherings, or community discussions?
application • medium - 4
How would you handle passionate disagreements about loyalty versus conscience when you know children are listening?
application • deep - 5
What does this scene reveal about how the next generation inherits unresolved moral conflicts from adults?
reflection • deep
Critical Thinking Exercise
Map Your Childhood Programming
Think of a passionate adult conversation you overheard as a child - maybe about money, family conflicts, work problems, or moral dilemmas. Write down what you absorbed from that moment, including the emotions and tensions you picked up. Then identify how those unresolved adult conflicts might still influence your own decision-making today.
Consider:
- •Children often absorb the emotional intensity more than the actual words
- •Adult conflicts become childhood programming about how to handle similar situations
- •What we think are private conversations often have the most lasting impact on listening children
Journaling Prompt
Write about a time when you realized you were repeating a pattern or conflict you witnessed as a child. How did recognizing this help you make different choices?
Coming Up Next...
Chapter 352: The Diary and the Marriage
The coming pages reveal couples navigate different values and priorities in marriage, and teach us the power of documenting daily life to understand what matters. These discoveries help us navigate similar situations in our own lives.