Original Text(~250 words)
CHAPTER XV The conversation at supper was not about politics or societies, but turned on the subject Nicholas liked best—recollections of 1812. Denísov started these and Pierre was particularly agreeable and amusing about them. The family separated on the most friendly terms. After supper Nicholas, having undressed in his study and given instructions to the steward who had been waiting for him, went to the bedroom in his dressing gown, where he found his wife still at her table, writing. “What are you writing, Mary?” Nicholas asked. Countess Mary blushed. She was afraid that what she was writing would not be understood or approved by her husband. She had wanted to conceal what she was writing from him, but at the same time was glad he had surprised her at it and that she would now have to tell him. “A diary, Nicholas,” she replied, handing him a blue exercise book filled with her firm, bold writing. “A diary?” Nicholas repeated with a shade of irony, and he took up the book. It was in French. December 4. Today when Andrúsha (her eldest boy) woke up he did not wish to dress and Mademoiselle Louise sent for me. He was naughty and obstinate. I tried threats, but he only grew angrier. Then I took the matter in hand: I left him alone and began with nurse’s help to get the other children up, telling him that I did not love him. For a long time he was silent, as if...
Continue reading the full chapter
Purchase the complete book to access all chapters and support classic literature
As an Amazon Associate, we earn a small commission from qualifying purchases at no additional cost to you.
Available in paperback, hardcover, and e-book formats
Summary
Nicholas discovers Mary keeping a diary about their children's daily behavior and moral development. Her careful observations reveal a mother tracking every small moment that shapes character—from tantrums to acts of kindness. Nicholas feels both admiration and inadequacy seeing Mary's spiritual dedication to their family's moral welfare. The conversation shifts to Nicholas's earlier argument with Pierre about political duty versus family responsibility. Nicholas believes his first obligation is to his immediate family—working to pay debts and secure their future—while Pierre argues for broader social responsibility. Mary diplomatically agrees with Nicholas while privately understanding Pierre's point about helping neighbors. As Nicholas discusses estate finances and dreams of buying back the family property, Mary listens with loving attention despite her mind wandering to deeper concerns about young Nicholas Bolkonsky, her nephew living with them. She worries she cannot love him as much as her own children and struggles with the impossible Christian ideal of loving everyone equally. The chapter reveals how two people can share a bed and life yet inhabit completely different moral universes—Nicholas focused on practical security, Mary on spiritual perfection. Their marriage works not because they're identical, but because they respect each other's different approaches to love and duty.
That's what happens. To understand what the author is really doing—and to discuss this chapter with confidence—keep reading.
Terms to Know
Moral diary
A written record tracking daily behavior and character development, especially for children. Parents would note small moments of kindness, defiance, or growth to understand patterns and guide moral education.
Modern Usage:
Today we see this in parenting apps that track milestones, or parents who journal about their kids' behavior to spot patterns and triggers.
Estate steward
A trusted manager who handled the daily business of running large properties - collecting rent, managing workers, overseeing repairs and finances. Essential for wealthy families who owned multiple properties.
Modern Usage:
Like a property manager today who handles multiple rental properties or a business manager who runs operations while the owner focuses on bigger picture decisions.
French education
Upper-class Russian children were taught by French governesses and tutors, often speaking French better than Russian. This showed cultural sophistication but also created distance from ordinary Russian life.
Modern Usage:
Similar to wealthy families today hiring expensive private tutors or sending kids to elite international schools that emphasize foreign languages and global culture.
Debt of honor
Financial obligations that went beyond legal requirements - family debts, promises to deceased relatives, or moral commitments that couldn't be enforced by law but defined a person's character.
Modern Usage:
Like paying back a friend who helped during hard times, or adult children feeling responsible for parents' medical bills even when not legally required.
Christian perfectionism
The belief that true Christians should love all people equally and perfectly, without favoritism even for family. An impossible standard that created guilt and spiritual struggle for sincere believers.
Modern Usage:
Today we see this in social media pressure to care equally about every cause, or parents feeling guilty for loving their own children more than their stepchildren.
Practical vs. spiritual duty
The tension between immediate responsibilities (paying bills, caring for family) versus higher moral obligations (helping society, serving God). Both are valid but often conflict in daily life.
Modern Usage:
Like choosing between working overtime to pay for your kid's college or volunteering at the homeless shelter - both are good, but you can't do everything.
Characters in This Chapter
Nicholas
Practical family man
Focuses on concrete responsibilities - managing the estate, paying debts, securing his family's future. He feels slightly inadequate compared to Mary's spiritual depth but is proud of his practical achievements.
Modern Equivalent:
The dad who works two jobs to pay the mortgage and thinks activism is a luxury he can't afford
Countess Mary
Spiritual perfectionist mother
Keeps detailed records of her children's moral development and struggles with the impossible standard of loving everyone equally. She supports Nicholas while privately understanding broader social responsibilities.
Modern Equivalent:
The mom who researches every parenting decision and feels guilty for not being able to love her stepkid exactly like her biological children
Pierre
Idealistic social reformer
Argues that people with privilege have duties beyond their immediate families. His wealth allows him to think about society while Nicholas must focus on survival and debt.
Modern Equivalent:
The wealthy friend who talks about social justice while you're just trying to keep your lights on
Andrúsha
Challenging child
Mary's eldest son whose tantrum becomes a case study in moral education. His behavior tests Mary's theories about child-rearing and reveals the daily struggles of parenting.
Modern Equivalent:
The strong-willed kid who turns every morning routine into a battle of wills
Why This Matters
Connect literature to life
This chapter teaches how to identify when apparent differences in relationships are actually complementary strengths rather than fundamental incompatibilities.
Practice This Today
This week, notice when someone's different approach to a shared goal irritates you, then ask: 'What do they see that I miss?'
You have the foundation. Now let's look closer.
Key Quotes & Analysis
"I left him alone and began with nurse's help to get the other children up, telling him that I did not love him."
Context: Mary describes how she handled her son's tantrum by withdrawing attention rather than escalating the conflict
This shows Mary's sophisticated understanding of child psychology - using natural consequences rather than punishment. She's experimenting with different approaches and documenting what works.
In Today's Words:
I ignored his tantrum and focused on his siblings, letting him know his behavior was pushing me away.
"My first duty is to my family, and not to you or anyone, and I have no right to sacrifice my children's welfare to some kind of philanthropic nonsense."
Context: Nicholas defending his focus on family finances over Pierre's suggestions about social responsibility
Nicholas draws a clear line between family duty and social obligation. He sees Pierre's idealism as a luxury he can't afford when his own children's security is at stake.
In Today's Words:
I need to take care of my own kids first before I can worry about saving the world.
"She was afraid that what she was writing would not be understood or approved by her husband."
Context: Mary's hesitation about sharing her moral diary with Nicholas
Even in a loving marriage, Mary fears judgment about her deepest concerns. This reveals how spiritual and practical people can feel isolated from each other even when they love deeply.
In Today's Words:
She worried he'd think her parenting journal was overthinking everything.
Intelligence Amplifier™ Analysis
The Road of Different Devotions
Two people can love deeply while expressing that love through completely different values and priorities, creating strength through complementary rather than identical approaches.
Thematic Threads
Marriage
In This Chapter
Nicholas and Mary's relationship shows how successful partnerships balance different strengths—his practical focus, her spiritual depth
Development
Evolved from earlier romantic ideals to show mature love based on respect for differences
In Your Life:
Your strongest relationships might be with people who complement rather than mirror your approach to life
Duty
In This Chapter
Nicholas prioritizes family financial security while Pierre argues for broader social responsibility—both valid forms of duty
Development
Continues the book's exploration of competing obligations and how different people define responsibility
In Your Life:
You might struggle between taking care of your immediate family versus helping your community or workplace
Parenting
In This Chapter
Mary carefully tracks her children's moral development while worrying about loving her nephew equally
Development
Shows the practical reality of raising children with intentional values
In Your Life:
You might feel guilty about loving some people in your care more naturally than others
Class
In This Chapter
Nicholas dreams of buying back family property, showing how financial security represents restored social position
Development
Continues theme of how economic circumstances shape identity and relationships
In Your Life:
Your financial goals might be tied to deeper needs for security and social belonging
Identity
In This Chapter
Each character maintains distinct moral frameworks—Nicholas as provider, Mary as spiritual guide
Development
Shows how people can grow into clear roles while remaining authentic to their nature
In Your Life:
You might find strength in accepting your natural way of caring rather than forcing yourself to be someone else
Modern Adaptation
Different Ways of Caring
Following Andrew's story...
Andrew watches his girlfriend Maria track their foster kids' behavior in a detailed notebook—every tantrum, every kindness, every small victory. She sees character-building in moments he barely notices. When he suggests they focus on saving money to get the kids' custody made permanent, she agrees but keeps writing. Andrew feels torn between his practical concerns—steady income, reliable housing, building stability—and Maria's deeper focus on the children's emotional and moral development. He respects her spiritual approach but worries about rent. She loves his protective instincts but sees beyond immediate needs. Their different approaches to caring sometimes clash, especially when discussing his ex-wife's struggles or how much help to give neighbors. Andrew focuses on what they can control and afford; Maria sees interconnected responsibility. Yet their relationship works because they don't demand the other change their way of loving.
The Road
The road Nicholas walked in 1869, Andrew walks today. The pattern is identical: two people can love deeply while operating from completely different moral frameworks—practical security versus spiritual growth.
The Map
This chapter provides a navigation tool for relationship conflicts: recognize that different approaches to caring can complement rather than compete. Stop trying to make your partner love exactly like you do.
Amplification
Before reading this, Andrew might have seen their different priorities as incompatible problems to solve. Now he can NAME different devotions, PREDICT how they complement each other, NAVIGATE toward mutual respect rather than conversion.
You now have the context. Time to form your own thoughts.
Discussion Questions
- 1
What different approaches do Nicholas and Mary take to caring for their family, and how do these differences show up in their daily lives?
analysis • surface - 2
Why does Mary's diary-keeping about the children make Nicholas feel both admiration and inadequacy? What does this reveal about how we judge our own efforts against others?
analysis • medium - 3
Think of a successful relationship in your life where you and the other person have very different ways of showing care. How do your different strengths complement each other?
application • medium - 4
When you encounter someone whose approach to responsibility feels completely different from yours, how do you decide whether to respect the difference or try to change them?
application • deep - 5
What does this chapter suggest about whether love requires two people to think exactly alike about what matters most?
reflection • deep
Critical Thinking Exercise
Map Your Complementary Strengths
Choose one important relationship in your life where you and the other person have different approaches to caring or responsibility. Draw two columns and list your primary way of showing care in one column and their primary way in the other. Then identify three specific ways these different approaches actually strengthen your shared goals rather than compete with each other.
Consider:
- •Focus on how they care, not whether they care enough
- •Look for what their approach accomplishes that yours might miss
- •Consider how trying to make them exactly like you might actually weaken the relationship
Journaling Prompt
Write about a time when someone's completely different approach to a shared responsibility initially frustrated you but eventually proved valuable. What did you learn about the difference between caring and conformity?
Coming Up Next...
Chapter 353: The Language of Love and Dreams
What lies ahead teaches us deep relationships develop their own communication style beyond logic, and shows us the difference between intellectual discussion and meaningful connection. These patterns appear in literature and life alike.